|
Ultimate John McCain Blog
Bloggers!Rss Ron Paul supporters hope to reshape GOP, McCain says he'll appoint good judges, but..., Barr's threat to McCain is McCain's own fault, …
Latest News!Written By Comment Count Comment Last Three Kevin
08/12/2008 01:11 PM
A letter by ConservativeHQ.com's Richard A. Viguerie, regarding John McCain's choice for VP, appeared in the August 12 Wall Street Journal. Click HERE to read the letter. Click below to comment on the letter.
-
0
Viguerie
08/14/2008 12:54 PM
According to CBO, the current fiscal year, which ends on September 30, will end up with a deficit of $400 Billion. While this figure is shockingly high, the truth is that the actually deficit is a lot higher. The $400 Billion deficit is based on an accounting fraud called the Unified Budget, in which money borrowed from the Social Security Trust Fund and which is added to the National Debt, is counted as income for the annual budget. This kind of trickery by Republicans and Democrats would land officers of publicly held companies in prison. When you take the $186 Billion that is being borrowed from Social Security and add it to the $400 Billion deficit that is being acknowledged, you get the real deficit of $586 Billion. Raiding the Social Security Trust Fund to finance the general operations of the federal government is a direct attack on the financial security of senior citizens. Trying to cover it up through deception is unconscionable. As for Fiscal Year 2009, the Bush Administration projects a deficit of $482 Billion, but that does not include $36 Billion from the Housing Bill, $80 Billion in war costs, and $227 Billion borrowed from the Social Security Trust Fund. The actual deficit next year will be $825 Billion--$343 Billion more than has been acknowledged. While the Housing Bill passed late and no one really is sure what the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will cost, it is inexcusable to pretend that the $227 Billion being borrowed from Social Security is an asset, rather than a debt that must be repaid. Republican and Democratic politicians should keep their hands off of Social Security surpluses. And they should start accounting honestly for the money borrowed from the Trust Fund.-
0
Kevin
08/11/2008 07:35 PM
The following press release was issued August 11, 2008:
Richard A. Viguerie, Chairman of ConservativeHQ.com, praised Senator John McCain for indicating that he would tap former U.S. Comptroller David Walker to help balance the federal budget. In a statement, Viguerie said: “Senator McCain has sent a clear signal that he would seek to end the massive deficits that have occurred during the Bush Administration and the last 10 years that the Republicans controlled Congress. “Under George W. Bush, Dennis Hastert, Tom DeLay, Bill Frist, and Ted Stevens, the Republican Party was transformed from the party of fiscal responsibility to the party of spend and spend, elect and elect. John McCain may very well be serious in wanting the GOP to return to its ideological roots. “At the end of July 2008, the national debt stood at $9.58 Trillion, of which $2.36 Trillion was owed to the Social Security Trust Fund. “For Fiscal Year 2009, the national debt is projected to increase another $825 Billion, including $227 Billion to be borrowed from Social Security. “This insanity must stop. Senator McCain’s embrace of deficit hawk David Walker is a strong indicator to conservatives and independents that he intends to try to do something to stop these irresponsible deficits. “I might note that David Walker has also talked with the fiscal advisers of Senator Barack Obama, so perhaps there is something hopeful in that as well. After all, Walker was appointed head of the General Accounting Office (GAO) by President Clinton and was appointed as Assistant Secretary of Labor by President Reagan. “Republicans and Democrats should be able to agree that the annual budget deficits are unconscionable and that the cumulative national debt threatens our children’s future.” -
0
Kevin
08/07/2008 09:58 PM
Reacting to Senator Barack Obama’s support for increasing Social Security payroll taxes, and news reports that Senator John McCain would consider increases in the payroll tax, Richard Viguerie, Chairman of ConservativeHQ.com, issued the following statement: Neither Senator Obama nor Senator McCain appear to know what happens to Social Security payroll taxes. Or maybe they know and hope the public is kept in the dark so that Social Security money can continue to fund wars and social programs. Every penny raised in payroll taxes beyond what is necessary to pay current benefits is spent by the federal government on everything from space ships to paper clips. In turn, the Social Security Trust Fund gets non-negotiable IOUs. In Fiscal Year 2009, the Social Security surplus is projected to be $227 Billion, which will be used to finance the general operations of government. The total IOUs in the Trust Fund, old age and disability, currently amount to $2.36 Trillion. When we get to 2017, when payroll taxes no longer produce enough revenue to pay full Social Security benefits, these IOUs in the Trust Fund could be as high as $4.971 Trillion, depending on the economy (in current dollars). Future Social Security payments can only be met by some onerous combination of additional tax increases to replace the Social Security payroll taxes that were spent on other things, reductions in benefits, or additional borrowing. Increasing payroll taxes now would provide more money for big spending programs not related to Social Security, while creating greater problems as to how seniors would receive their checks in the future. It is highly irresponsible for Senators Obama and McCain to even consider increases in payroll taxes until legislation is enacted to make sure Social Security surpluses are saved, not spent. Tim
1
Viguerie
07/31/2008 06:40 PM
My July 29 news release, Bush White House Hides True Scope of Federal Deficit, had a serious error that I must correct.
The real budget deficit, which I accused the Bush White House of understating by $307 Billion, is even worse than I said! President Bush’s team left out of their 2009 budget shortfall projection the additional $36.6 Billion from the Housing Boondoggle, er, Bill, which was passed just last weekend. This reminds us all, Congress is still in session, so the budget deficit could still increase and taxpayers’ wallets may be picked even more. Here are the numbers:
Therefore, the actual deficit is about 73% greater than Bush’s very misleading number Americans feel that politicians regularly lie and mislead them. However, it’s sad and dangerous for the country when the President of the United States starts acting like another politician – parsing, dissembling, misleading – even lying. President Bush owes the American people an apology for deliberately giving them wrong deficit numbers. With most of our country’s major institutions facing major scandals and loss of respect by Americans--9% approve of Congress--President Bush should set an example and tell us the truth regardless of how it reflects on his Administration.” -
0
Viguerie
07/29/2008 07:07 PM
-
Bob Silo, Art Kelly, Adrian Salsgiver, …
4
Viguerie
07/29/2008 05:28 PM
The following is the text of a press release, Tuesday, July 29, 2008. Richard Viguerie: Stevens indictment symptomatic of Culture of Corruption in politics (Manassas, VA) The indictment of Senator Ted Stevens, the senior Republican in the U.S. Senate, is “just a symptom of the corruption that has infected Republicans and Democrats alike,” Richard A. Viguerie, Chairman of ConservativeHQ.com, said. “That infection is spreading rapidly through Washington and all of American politics, from the houses of Congress to the courthouses.” “Sometimes, as in the ethanol subsidy program, or the bailout of the crooked mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the level of corruption is so large that it’s hard for the mind to grasp. It’s like an Enron a day,” he said. Said Viguerie: “There used to be hardly a day that passed without some new story of a politician who had abused the public trust. But now it seems to be happening several times a day, somewhere in this country, that a politician is indicted, or going off to jail, or resigning to avoid prosecution. “In 2006, the image of congressional Republicans as corrupt was a major factor in their loss of control of Congress. Since then, the Democrats are turning out to be just as bad, but the Republicans have done little to clean up their act.” Viguerie noted that Republican reformers who have stood up to the GOP establishment have been targeted for retaliation. “Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives, politicians of all stripes should understand that, since they won’t take action to clean up their own houses, the American people will do it for them,” he said. --30-- -
0
Kevin
05/07/2008 08:57 AM
-
bill, R Michael Hill, Carl Reasor, …
10
Viguerie
05/13/2008 10:56 AM
-
David Edward Garber, Bob Holtzclaw, Ben Powell, …
16
Kevin
07/15/2008 02:58 PM
A columnist for a Massachusetts newspaper has this take on Richard Viguerie's speech at Freedom Fest last weekend: http://www.milforddailynews.com/opinion/x2109420142/Young-GOP-base-to-throw-McCain-under-the-bus Young: GOP base to throw McCain under the bus? -
0
Viguerie
06/25/2008 04:57 PM
The following is an e-mail that UltimateJohnMcCain.com publisher Richard A. Viguerie sent Tuesday to conservatives across the country: Special Message to Conservatives $4.00 Gas is a Teaching Moment for Conservatives America’s energy problems have been brought to us courtesy of the Americans are justifiably upset with the high cost of gasoline and everything that depends on fuel—electricity, heating oil, food, truck transportation, airline tickets, and more. Higher energy costs sets off a chain reaction that makes everything more expensive. This public anger and alarm spells a major opportunity for conservatives because liberal policies and nonsensical regulations are directly responsible for higher energy prices. Energy prices provide a prime example to show how liberal policies are actually harmful to the poor, working families and the elderly – those whom liberal Democrats claim to be their “base.” We conservatives must offer responsible, free-market solutions to this liberal mess. In other words, this is a “teaching moment” for conservatives. We have a major opportunity to show the American public how the liberals have messed up their lives. High energy prices caused by bad liberal policies exemplify perfectly the differences between conservative principles and failed liberal ideology. We must act now. The biggest problem in doing this is our mindset. The lack of Republican leadership has put conservatives on the defense for so long that we’re forgetting how to play offense. So we in the conservative grassroots have to do the job ourselves. We’ve done it before—think of Catastrophic Health Act in the 80’s and HillaryCare in the ’90s. These successful battles were led by grass roots activist – not by national Republican leaders. We’ve done it before and we can do it again. We have to point out how the liberal worldview, which is that government – led by them, of course – needs to control everyone and everything. As with energy prices, central government control does not work. In the attached article I give you the basic arguments we can use. We need to employ these arguments in every venue open to us including: talk radio, TV, press releases, syndicated columns, op-ed articles, newsletters, media interviews, letters to the editors, blogs, emails, and resolutions at political party meetings/conventions, local government meetings, political debates, etc., etc. We have an opportunity for conservatives to take ownership of the #1 issue in America this summer and advance the conservative cause while putting the political left on the defensive. Conservatives must provide the leadership because the establishment, big-government Republicans, as usual, have run for the tall grass and are AWOL. When you look at the solutions that Democrats are offering to “fix” the energy crisis – more taxes and even proposals for socialization of the oil industry – and see the mostly timid, defensive solutions being offered by the Republican leadership – conservatives can see clearly that we must provide the missing leadership through our grass roots activism. Let’s move on this one! BELOW IS THE ARTICLE LINKED TO THE E-MAIL ABOVE. It is posted at http://conservativehq.com/news-from-the-front/liberalscausedcrisis. Liberalism has caused our energy crisis / Free markets are the solution As usual in a crisis, liberals are trying to take advantage of the situation. They are using the issue of high energy prices to push their agenda of oppressive regulation, ultra-high taxes, and the diversion of many billions of taxpayers’ dollars into “alternative fuel” efforts that, with few exceptions, are corporate-welfare scams. Liberals want us to forget that they spent years pushing for higher prices. The New York Times, in an October 24, 2005 editorial, claimed that, “Cheap gas is no longer compatible with a secure nation, a healthy environment or a healthy economy – if ever it was.” On March 26, 2006, CNN’s Jack Cafferty said, “I hope gas prices go as high as they have to go to get the rest of these morons off the road in these big Hummers with the four wheel drive and the obscuring of the view for everybody else on the road...” The Christian Science Monitor, on May 12 of this year, in an editorial entitled “Why Pump Prices Need to Stay High,” declared, “Rather than prevent $4-a-gallon gas now, legislators should welcome it.” Barack Obama June 10, 2008 on CNBC: “I think I would have preferred a gradual adjustment.” Which is to say, he’s for making life uncomfortable for Americans, just more slowly. In their desire to “punish” higher gas consumption by some, liberals are willing to make gas, home fuel, and all food and goods transported to stores more expensive. To “punish” Cadillac drivers, liberals have in fact punished working families – and the elderly and the poor are the hardest hit – by high costs of oil. And liberals want us to forget how their policies pushed us toward their goal of higher gas prices. In fact, they want “Big Oil,” Bush, Republicans, and conservatives to get the blame for what they did. And liberals can’t let our problems be solved, because then we wouldn’t need liberals anymore! We can make this a “teaching moment” by helping America and the world see the effect that liberal policies have on people’s lives. By making energy more expensive, liberal policies make people poorer. By keeping us energy-dependent on foreign governments, including repressive regimes such as those in Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, liberal policies make the world a more dangerous place. By making energy more expensive and preventing use of domestic energy resources, liberals are causing the loss of American jobs. And by bottling up domestic energy resources through regulation, liberals encourage OPEC and other foreign oil sources to keep their prices inflated. How did liberals accomplish these things? They deliberately keep trillions of barrels of oil stuck in the ground, right here in the United States and offshore.
Meanwhile…
We need to make it clear to the American people that liberals are standing in the way of cheaper and more abundant energy. Americans aren’t radical environmentalists. Rather, we are, as a whole, practical and responsible conservationists. For example, according to a recent Rasmussen poll, Americans support drilling off the coasts of Florida and California by 67% to 18%. That support included 57% of Democrats. We can turn this issue around on the liberals. We’ve done it before. In the 1970s, during an earlier energy crisis, liberals tried to take over the energy sector, with such policies as government price controls and “windfall profits taxes.” The result: They created gas lines, odd-even rationing, and Jimmy Carter’s Thermostat Police, all of which helped elect Ronald Reagan president. (Reagan then deregulated energy, which caused prices to drop and supplies to become abundant. “The economic realities of the marketplace,” he said, “have done more to bring down the price of oil than all those years of frenetic government regulating.”) In the 1980s, liberals tried to dominate the foreign-policy debate, putting hundreds of thousands of protesters in the streets in opposition to President Reagan’s policies on the Cold War. The result: They stigmatized themselves, for decades, as people who cozy up to dictators and who try to make America weak. In the 1990s, liberals attempted, with HillaryCare, a government takeover of the most important one-seventh of the American economy. The result: They produced such revulsion at the prospect of bureaucratic healthcare rationing that the American people gave the Republicans control of Congress for the first time in 40 years. This time, as in the 1970s, liberals think they can use high energy prices to expand their power at the expense of all Americans. The liberal energy policies that concentrate power in Washington need to be repealed and replaced with practical and responsible policies based in the free market, policies that will open domestic energy production and reduce our dependency on foreign sources. This will:
David Treibs, david Pruitt, Howard Hughes, …
18
Kevin
06/24/2008 12:05 PM
In the presidential elections of 2000 and 2004, Republicans and Democrats were almost evenly matched in the only battleground that counts, the Electoral College. So the big question for 2008 is: Which normally Republican states will Obama snatch away, and which normally Democratic states will McCain grab? I've created a model that takes into account various factors, such as Obama's strong appeal among young people, those highly credentialed (such as people with advanced degrees), and African-Americans, and McCain's appeal to the military and their families, Appalachians and working-class people (except African-Americans), and independents seeking a straight-talk type. So McCain does better than a Republican might be expected to do in, say, Michigan and Kentucky, and Obama does better than another Democrat in Virginia and Colorado. (There is an added factor, the candidacy of Bob Barr, that puts states like Georgia and Virginia into play.) If you have any thoughts on building a model to project the November election, please pass them along to me at editor@ultimatejohnmccain.com. Here's my current projection of how the Electoral College would work out in November, if things continued the way they've been going. |